Wednesday, December 23, 2009

The Prince Who Became A Pauper For One Night

Prince William , the 2nd heir to the British throne and the so-called shadow King of UK from now spent a night in the cold London streets to experience how the homeless people feel while sleeping in the street. Some people are calling it a stunt , others are wondering how the British royal forgot his restricted etiquette , Crown while the majority are admiring the future King of UK.


I admire what Prince William did so much ,in fact I wonder when our crown prince will come from his ivory tower and feels even for one night the woes of the shanty towns ; of course I am speaking about Gamal Mubarak.
I know his supporters will come and tell : Ok miss smartypants what about this charity project of "1000 poor village and shanty town" !!?? He goes to the poorest areas in Egypt and pulls them from poverty ...etc
And I will fire back saying that or rather wondering if he watches Amr El-Lathy show to see how people are sleeping in tan houses in the middle of the cold winter with no electricity nor water!!?? Because if he does
, he will not be able to sleep at night peacefully while he knows he can't change a lot with a simple phone call at 11 PM Thursday to make the lives of those people living in Zarzara at Port Said slightly little better.
Gamal Mubarak only comes to shanty towns after they are cleaned and flower pots are put all the way and then when he leaves the streets return as they are and the flower pots are removed!!??
There is a huge difference between Prince William and Gamal Mubarak ; the first did not have to do this because he will become the King naturally insh Allah not to mention he does not rule his country unlike Gamal Mubarak who is ruling the country from now !!
Already I dare Gamal Mubarak to stay one night with a single bodyguard in Zarzara or any other major shanty town in Egypt ! 
The Prince and the pauper by Mark Twain 

4 comments:

  1. سلام الله عليكم

    المدونة زينوبيا كل التحية والتقدير
    أنا أحمد صحفي وكنت أريد التواصل معك حول تقرير صحفي أقوم بإعدادة
    وهذا هو الايميل الخاص بي

    m_fathy75@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sudanese Observer12/23/2009 10:06:00 PM

    It is a stunt but at least the hereditary part of the Monarchy is accepted in the UK's constitutional setup, unlike Egypt which is a Republic which was founded to counter the backwardness of hereditary systems!

    ReplyDelete
  3. @ Sudanese Observer even if it is a stunt at least he is trying to do something or appear to be doing something to get some public appeal. At least he cares about what his ppl think of him. At least the British Monarchy got the lesson a long time ago that unless a considerable percentage of the Brits want them they wont last. Sadly, all those ruling MENA think theyve owned us regardless of whether they belong to a republican or monarchy system and those who make the difference are the ppl and so we are the main source of the problem here. I still remember the joke of how bashar got to rule Syria and how in MENA the juniors seem to be coming from Egypt, Libya, Yemen and even Tunisia where the son of law seem to be playing the role of the junior

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, given that both Him & His Brother enlisted in the military and both have been deployed overseas (not kept home for a fancy uniform in a secure army base).

    Prince Harry even was scheduled for deployment to a front line in Iraq,and when this went public and he became a danger to soldiers around him, he secretly served in Afghanistan instead! (both being the most dangerous at the time)

    You'll see it's perfectly in keeping with his and his brother's lifestyle, even if it is a stunt, it delivers a strong message indeed.

    "There's no way I'm going to put myself through Sandhurst and then sit on my arse back home while my boys are out fighting for their country." ~ Prince Harry of Wales [From Wikipedia]

    ReplyDelete

Thank You for your comment
Please keep it civilized here, racist and hateful comments are not accepted
The Comments in this blog with exclusion of the blog's owner does not represent the views of the blog's owner.